![]() ![]() The first ex4600 complains that protection link is not configured.ġ. Then enabled mc-ae on the ae6 on primary ex4600. I shutdown the interface on second ex4600 towards the client Reading docs last night it states that the protection link should be the ICL, Which I understand to be the ae0 interface. The iccp is established and the show interface mc-ae showed the ae6 up-up on both peersĪnd errors like: Jan 17 00:21:19 rtaggtmp01 l2ald: L2ALD_FREE_MAC_FAILED: ERROR:FwdE:0x9bffd00 EFlag:0x1802101f RGID:0001 AEID:0006 SERVICE-ID:01 UNIT:00 PEERID:16843018MAC: 08:5b:0e:72:4d:ae moved: already in RMAC List When I connect the client with both links, everything looks ok but I am getting traffic looping. I originally had the multi-chassis protection link as xe-0/0/23. Members ĭescription "ICCP Link to ex4600 xe-0/0/23" ĭescription "EtherChannel to vca-l2oob-02" Link xe-0/0/23 is used exclusively for the ICCP trafficĭescription "EtherChannel between ex4600 ICL" Im having issues setting up MC LAG on a pair of ex4600 with the recommended release code D40. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |